The goal of this study was to evaluate the expression patterns of these three functionally relevant proteins, PAX5, c Met and paxillin, in the setting of neuroendocrine tumors from the lung. Major neuroendocrine tumors from the lung had been chosen from the archives from the Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, which include 38 TC, 6 AC, 34 SCLC and 11 LCNEC.
Immunohistochemical stains had been performed with regular protocols.
Scoring from the staining intensity in the cytoplasm and the nucleus was separately performed as follows: The expression levels from the four markers are summarized in Table 1. Photomicrographs of representative situations, 1 from each tumor variety, are shown in Figure 1.
Actually, all tumors included within this study expressed at the least HSP one among these two proteins, and more than 80% of them strongly expressed at the least one among these two proteins. Even so, the expression of PAX5 varied substantially among diverse tumor types, reduce in TC than in AC, SCLC and LCNEC. Paxillin also showed substantially diverse expression levels, highest in TC and lowest in LCNEC.
The correlation among PAX5 and paxillin was moderate to strong in SCLC and LCNEC, but very weak in TC. Correlation among other markers was weak and did not display statistical significance. All four types of neuroendocrine tumors from the lung showed frequent expression of c Met and p c Met.
Nuclear translocation of phosphorylated c Met was observed, while its biological significance just isn't fully understood. That is in keeping with all the preceding observation that there was no correlation among c Met mutations and its expression level in SCLC.
It can be identified that TGF-beta immunohistochemistry has inherent limitations like a procedure for measuring the level of protein, specially in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues. Far more importantly, PAX5 appeared to directly market the transcription of c Met; and knocking down PAX5 had a synergizing effect with c Met inhibitors in killing SCLC cells. 9 This observation brought up the possibility of co targeting each proteins for the treatment of lung cancers.
It undergoes phosphorylation upon receiving the HGF/c Met signal, and enhances tumor cell migration and spread. We could not come across any evidence in the literature that suggests an intrinsic linkage among the expression manage mechanisms of these two proteins.
As opposed to SCLC and LCNEC, no correlation among paxillin and PAX5 was detected in TC. Carcinoid, alternatively, is really distinct each clinically and biologically in comparison to SCLC and LCNEC.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Do One Has Any PDK 1 Signaling Survivin independent scientific studies Doubtfulness
Labels:
Adrenergic Receptors,
bcr-abl,
caspase,
jak stat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment